Live from the Afterlife

Live from the Afterlife

by

You can be there when we “speak” with the afterlife! In 1995, we began our spiritual conversations with the afterlife, contacting the spirit of Rikkity. Since then we have had thousands of such conversations. We have found these messages to be extremely insightful and helpful. Over the years we have shared some of the transcripts of our communications but they felt second-hand in a way. So, here are these “Live from the Afterlife” podcasts – live recordings of actual sessions. and join in the conversations about Spiritual Persistence at https://sp-blog.org

here is the text of this conversation:

“Ok, let’s talk combining into more complex entities. Does that mean your spiritual entity connects with other entities? How physical! Think about it in more sharing terms. All that you are spiritually is open and available to the other elements of the greater complexity, not individually but collectively. It’s not like a frat mixer, it’s like an anthology. And the identity of the new entity is only real within itself. So the elements can sense and know the totality of the other elements but only within the reality of the greater complexity. If any entity were to step outside… and I don’t mean that literally… they would cease to have connection to all that.

“I give you a flawed analogy—flawed not in being wrong, but in being incomplete. A group of people decide to dine. Each person decides on their own. They arrive at this little ristorante on a side street in Firenze. Si si. And they find themselves at a big shared table with a common meal and magic happens. Communications cross languages, lives mingle. There develops a common and familiar story. The new unit has its own identity. But if anyone were to step outside or even go to the WC, the new entity would no longer be and while they might remember being there they would no longer be part of that new whole. The new combination exists as meaningful only within itself and as others observe it, but not as qualities that can be separated.

“The model I have used is of molecules but that is both too simple and wrong. Too physical. It is the knowing connection of being, not the being itself! Unpack that.”

Recent Episodes

  • Meaning in the Connections and not the Connected Elements

    3 years ago
  • Rachel Maddow Style Program on Finite versus Infinite

    3 years ago
  • Five Questions About the Meaning of Existence and Our Potential

    3 years ago
  • Protopian vs Dystopian Focus

    3 years ago
  • Organic vs Inorganic Meaning, Part 2

    3 years ago
  • Organic vs Inorganic Meaning, Part 1

    3 years ago
  • Spiritual Fulfillment is not a Product to be Sought

    3 years ago
  • Search for Meaning in the Universe

    3 years ago
  • Spiritual Senses

    3 years ago
  • Thinking About Fulfillment

    3 years ago